| | |
| | \startsection[title={\WPintro{}}] |
| | - {\it\WPname{}} is a system for moderated deliberation to achieve |
| | - group consensus on \WPproposals{} through anonymous |
| | - contributions and collaboration. |
| | + \italic{\WPname{}} is a technical solution for anonymous collaboration |
| | + on \WPproposals{} to reach a consensus. The solution empowers people |
| | + having diverse opinions to contribute constructively regarding \WPproposal{} |
| | + creation, deliberation, and approval. Contributions are accepted (or |
| | + rejected) by mediators, who guard against inappropriate content. |
| | + |
| | + \WPname{} helps people understand issues, list implications, share |
| | + solutions, and agree on a course of action. |
| | + \stopsection |
| | + |
| | + \startsection[title={Motivation}] |
| | + When making important decisions that require consensus, people can |
| | + gather information from a variety of sources in many ways. Verifying and |
| | + correcting that information can be burdensome to impossible, depending |
| | + on the source. Accurate information is essential to fair democratic |
| | + practice.\cite[carpini@americans] |
| | + |
| | + %These include meeting minutes, web sites, news media, scanned pages, |
| | + %filed reports, Microsoft\WPregistered{} Word documents, Adobe |
| | + %\WPregistered{} PDF files, and content management systems (such as |
| | + %Microsoft SharePoint). |
| | + |
| | + \WPname{} is an open, central warehouse for \WPproposals{}. |
| | + \stopsection |
| | + |
| | + \startsection[title={Objective}] |
| | + TODO |
| | + \stopsection |
| | + |
| | + \startsection[title={Moderation}] |
| | + TODO: Explain moderated deliberation and other new terms |
| | + \stopsection |
| | + |
| | + \startsection[title={Solution}] |
| | + TODO |
| | + \stopsection |
| | + |
| | + \startsection[title={Audience}] |
| | + The document has two parts. The first part, which explains how the |
| | + solution operates, is intended for: elected officials, managers, |
| | + and business analysts. The second part, which provides technical |
| | + information, is intended for software developers. |
| | \stopsection |
| | |
 |
| | \stopitem |
| | \stopitemize |
| | - \stopsection |
| | - |
| | - \startsection[title={Transparency}] |
| | - The system is designed to encourage openness, communication, and |
| | - accountability. All past and present actions and interactions with |
| | - the system must be available for everyone to scrutinize. The |
| | - \href{source code}{https://bitbucket.org/djarvis/world-politics/} |
| | - must also be open for analysis and development. |
| | \stopsection |
| | - |
| | - \startsection[title={Voting}] |
| | - Prior to voting, voters must communicate their intent to |
| | - participate with a Registration Authority (RA). The RA provides |
| | - a unique token upon verifying the voter's identity. The token is |
| | - entered into the system; the voter creates an account and votes |
| | - using said token. |
| | - |
| | - Goals for voting include correctness, verifiability, and anonymity. |
| | - |
| | - \startsubsection[title=Correctness] |
| | - The system is deemed correct if: |
| | - |
| | - \startitemize |
| | - \startitem |
| | - only voters who have registered with the RA may vote; |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - voters cannot vote multiple times on an item; |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - voters cannot replace votes; |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - voters may change how they voted on an item; and |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - third-parties cannot change the tabulation outcome. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \stopitemize |
| | - \stopsubsection |
| | - |
| | - \startsubsection[title=Verifiability] |
| | - Verifiability allows voters and observers to verify that the |
| | - outcomes correspond to the votes legitimately cast. Multiple |
| | - verifiability types can be distinguished, |
| | - including:\cite[kremer@verify] |
| | - |
| | - \startitemize |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Individual.} Voters can verify that their votes are |
| | - part of the tally and are counted in the final result. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Universal.} Anyone can verify that all votes have been |
| | - tallied correctly, and voters can verify that their votes are |
| | - included. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Eligible.} Anyone can verify that every vote for a |
| | - particular outcome was cast by a registered voter, at most |
| | - one vote per voter, and voters can verify that their own |
| | - votes are legitimate. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \stopitemize |
| | - |
| | - Verifying results must be simple and expeditious. |
| | - \stopsubsection |
| | - |
| | - \startsubsection[title=Anonymity] |
| | - The system should further {\it{privacy}}, |
| | - {\it{coercion-resistance}} and |
| | - {\it{receipt-freeness}}.\cite[delaune@coercion] |
| | - |
| | - \startitemize |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Privacy.} Votes must remain private, even when a |
| | - third-party can view all system data, communications, and |
| | - source code. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Coercion-resistance.} Voters cannot cooperate with a |
| | - coercer to prove their vote's directionality (i.e., |
| | - {\it{for}} or {\it{against}}). |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \startitem |
| | - \bold{Receipt-freeness.} Voters must not receive any |
| | - information (a receipt) that can prove the vote's |
| | - directionality to a coercer. |
| | - \stopitem |
| | - \stopitemize |
| | - |
| | - Votes recieved from independent, remote locations (such as |
| | - hand-held, Internet-enabled devices), are susceptible to |
| | - coercion. The system does not, and arguably cannot, address this |
| | - vulnerability. |
| | - \stopsubsection |
| | - |
| | \stopchapter |
| | |